Music Copyright Laws:
Using cover song versions legally
Click here for more CleverJoe articles
The Cover Song Quagmire:
Three Ways to Obtain Mechanical
for Legally Recording/Distributing Cover Versions on CD
By Dale Turner (scroll down for bio and CD link)
For many musicians, a considerable amount of "play time" is spent
learning other people's songseither for cover band gigs, wedding
performances, or merely to study another artist's work. If this sounds like
you, as your repertoire has grown, it's highly likely one or more of those songs
has sparked something extra-special inside you. Why not immortalize your efforts
by recording some of those magical numbers and putting them on a CD? At the
very least, one of those "classic" tracks might be the perfect way to punctuate
your next disc!
But before you act, you need to know what steps you need to take
to ensure you're protected, and the original songwriter gets his/her due. With
this article, we'll take a look at the three primary paths you can take to obtain
a mechanical license [a.k.a. Circular
73Compulsory License For Making and Distributing Phonorecords (PDF)]
to legally release your version of another artist's song. For reality's sake,
we'll also include a little"story" to go with itmy personal experience
releasing an album comprised of coversto walk you through this somewhat
tricky, time-consuming process. Let the games begin!
Way back in December 2000 I recorded a set of 10 cover songs,
intending them to be nothing more than a CD-R Christmas gift for my Mother.
Nothing fancy, just a bunch of classic tunes (Beach Boys, Beatles, Queen, etc.)
I'd spent some time on months earlier, developing from an "arrangement" standpoint
to add to my repertoire, then recorded totally "raw" in my home studio. When
the holidays finally hit, needless to say, ma dug my little "stocking stuffer."
And as an added bonus, it was a big hit amongst my relatives!
Well, after playing some of these tracks for some of my (thankfully)
enthusiastic friends, I was encouraged to take these songs to the next leveloffer
them as a full-blown, shrink-wrapped CD, available to "quirky cover song" fans.
However, though I went the extra mile trying to conceive of unique ways to present
these tunes, I wrote nary a note of this music. In order to legally (and ethically)
pull this off, I'd have to find out who to pay, credit, and get permission from.
With none of my friends involved in publishing or entertainment law, I hadn't
the foggiest idea how to go about this.
Enter the Harry Fox Agency, or HFA. After scouring the internet
for "ballpark" legal advice, it became clear that the HFA was the central hub
of all things relating to obtaining the rights to record and sell copies of
songs written by other parties. (NOTE: Outside the US., similar Mechanical
Rights agencies exist for Canada,
the UK, Europe
and elsewhere.) Upon locating the Harry Fox Agency's home page (www.harryfox.com),
I discovered that the HFA (among other things) specializes in the following
Mechanical Licensing (licensing of copyrighted musical
compositions for use on CDs, records, tapes, and certain digital configurations)
Digital Licensing (licensing of copyrighted musical compositions in digital
configurations, including but not limited to, full downloads, limited-use downloads,
on-demand streaming and CD burning.)
Given that I was going the "CD" route, playing someone else's
"copyrighted musical composition," this confirmed some of the things that I'd
already read onlineI needed a MECHANICAL LICENSE!
On the left side of the HFA homepage read the words: "To obtain
an HFA Limited Quantity License (less than 2,500 units), use Songfile.com (click
here)." Since I was planning on manufacturing 1,000 unitsarguably
the most common number for an "indie" CD runHFA's www.songfile.com
sounded right for my purposes.
On songfile.com, the steps to follow were simple: I clicked the
"Song Search" link (note their browser requirements), entered the title of one
of the songs I covered, and searched their database for the types of licenses
available. Upon selecting the "mechanical license" option, I was asked the following
multiple-choice questions (my answers appear in parentheses):
1) How many recordings will you make? [2500 COPIES OR LESS
(LICENSE FEE MINIMUM IS 500 UNITS)]
2) Manufactured in what country? (WITHIN U.S.)
3) Distributed in what country? (WITHIN U.S.)
4) Which type of Organization do you represent? (INDIVIDUAL)
Based on the length of each song and the number of units you plan
to sell, songfile.com then computes a fee based upon the statutory mechanical
royalty ratethe money collected for each sale of your cover version
that goes directly to the song's writer and publisher (often split 50/50). Currently
(January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2005), the "statutory mechanical royalty rate"
8.50 Cents for songs 5 minutes or less
1.65 Cents per minute or fraction thereof over 5 minutes.
At that rate, for my purposes, covering a single song under five
minutes long (selling 1,000 copies of it), added up to an $85 fee. Since I was
going to be licensing 10 songs, I'd have to pay at least $850! (Two of
the songs I recorded were actually over six minutes. At the current rate, that
calculates to $115 each.) To say the least, that's a pretty substantial up-front
investment! (On a per song basis, this fee can be paid online by credit card;
otherwise you have to do the entire process manually by filling out this
form and mailing it in to the HFA with a check.)
It's also worth noting that, at first, I thought this "fee" was
merely the cost of obtaining the license. I shuddered at the thought
of having to pay this, PLUS royalties at a rate of about eight cents per songto
say nothing of my CD's photography, art design, manufacturing costs! To my relief,
a few months later, a friend informed me that the fee I paid was just an "advance"
on the royalty for 1,000 copies of each song sold; the license itself was apparently
only $10. (According to the fine print, you're "charged a $10.00 non-refundable
processing fee per license, which will be added to the license amount and processed
as a single charge to your account.")
Back to Harry Fox... After shelling out for several songs (you
provide a ballpark release date and other details, submit your credit card info
online, then receive a license via e-mail in a matter of hours or days), I entered
the name of a Jimi Hendrix song I wanted to license. After answering all the
same questions in the exact same manner as my previous song selections, the
following words appeared before me on my monitor (in red, no doubt for dramatic
This song is not available for mechanical licensing.
Noooooo!!! In a panic, I then entered the details of a Billy Joel song I recorded.
Ditto: "This song is not available for mechanical licensing."
As far as I knew, the Harry Fox Agency held the rights to all
the songs legally available for the "covers" treatment; anything else was a
no go. I figured this was enough to all but doom my little project (*sniffle*).
For starters, those two songs demonstrated an aspect of my playing and singing
that the other eight songs didn't. Further, I just didn't think it'd be cool
to put out an "eight-song" covers CDlet alone one without my man Jimi
being represented! Lastly, since this CD was already over three years old, it
didn't feel right to do two "new" songs and slap them on at the end of the collection.
To my mind, that would ruin the idea of me releasing an "accidental" album,
if you will.
But then I discovered an interesting legal fact: Once a song has
been commercially released by an artist, that artist's song may be re-recorded
and released by anyone who chooses to do so. This holds true, provided
that the melody/lyric isn't substantially altered in the "cover" version, and
that they pay proper fees/royalties directly to the song's copyright holder.
(On the flip side, if you release a disc with cover songs on it, then
try to obtain proper licensing after the fact, you're no longer eligibleand
possibly subject to penalties/prosecution for copyright infringement!) All I
needed to do was investigate who owned the publishing rights to those Jimi Hendrix
and Billy Joel songs. This information (including each publisher's address)
was readily available through the following Performance Rights organizations:
(NOTE: Outside the US., similar Performance Rights organizations
exist for Canada, the UK,
Later, I found that the above "publisher's search" process could
be sped up considerably by going through the Music Publishers' Association's
web site (www.mpa.org).
After obtaining both publishers' contact info, I was left with
that resounding "Now what?" feeling. Again, the ol' internet paid off. I found
I needed to send to each publisher what's referred to as a Notice of Intention
to Obtain Compulsory License for Making and Distributing Sound Recordings.
After more cyber searching, I finally found out what the heck that wasat
the overwhelmingly incomprehensible (to my neophyte self) U.S.
Copyright Office web site. Reading that document was almost enough to make
me toss in the towel (and my cookies). But then, much to my satisfaction, I
came across this
totally "pre-fab" (RTF) letter, designed by a friendly webmaster"fill-in-the-blanks"
stylefor submission to artists' publishers. This letter appeared to adhere
to the specifications
(PDF) prescribed by the US Copyright Office.
From here, the Billy Joel licensing process went off without a
hitch. I sent in the above letter (certified mail, return receipt); upon receipt,
they asked me via e-mail to specify the number of copies I intended to sell
(information omitted from the "pre-fab" letter I used). They then sent a written
agreement for my signature, additionally asking for an $85 check covering the
sum of advance royalties paid on 1,000 units. (My research revealed that you
could try to negotiate a lower royalty rate with each publisher. However, I
happily agreed to pay the "compulsory"or "standard mandatory"rate.)
This agreement also provided me with the exact wording for the "publisher/writer
credit" I needed to include in my CD's liner notes, and stipulated that the
publisher receive two copies of the disc "as released." (Individual writer/publisher
credits for every song you cover need to be included in your CD's liner
notes, by the way.) Upon execution of the agreement, they granted me the license
and quickly sent me a hard copy for my records.
A search for Hendrix's publishing was another matter entirely.
Depending on which performance rights organization I searched through, both
"Bella Godiva Music" and/or "Experience Hendrix LLC" administered Hendrix's
publishing rights. To make a long story short, Experience Hendrix LLC was the
correct one. I sent my same "pre-fab" letter to their P.O. Box (the only indicated
address); it came back three weeks later as "undeliverable to addressee" because
nobody signed for it. (Again, I sent it certified w/return receipta bad
idea for P.O. boxes, apparently.) On a deadline by now (I was looking to release
this disc in a couple months), I located a phone number for Experience Hendrix
LLC and got the ball rolling that way. They requested I e-mail their Music Publishing
& Licensing contact, asking them to e-mail me back (as an attachment): "a
downloadable version of the form I need to submit in order to obtain a mechanical
license for the making and distribution of 1000 CDsTrack: 'Castles Made
of Sand'." I was also informed that they needed to approve a copy of my "cover
version" first, before they could grant me a mechanical license. Fine by me!
I sent them a CD-R copy of my almost-final mix, with their filled-out e-mail
form (replete with Hendrix logo!), and a few weeks later, finally got the official
So there you have it: Two of three possible paths for legally
covering another artist's song. In the end, if you go direct to the publisher,
you'll do away with the HFA's $10 filing fee. Personally, given the time it
took "going direct" (to say nothing of the anxiety it caused), I'd gladly pay
that $10 any day of the week! You'll just need to weigh your own personal "time
vs. money" options.
So what about licensing method #3? Well, if you've exhausted all
reasonable means and can't locate the copyright holder(s) for the song(s) you've
covered, you can file the same Notice of Intention to Obtain a Compulsory
License with the Library of Congress, Copyright Office, Licensing Division.
Each song needs to be filed separately, and there's a $12 filing fee (per song).
The Library of Congress will establish to whom royalties are paid by identifying
the copyright owner. At that point, you'll need to make all due royalty paymentsand
make sure you pay! (Hint: "dot gov"!) If you find you need to go that route,
make sure you compose your correspondence to these
specifications (PDF), as prescribed by the US Copyright office. In the event
you have any questions, the Library of Congress can provide you with detailed
instructions concerning this form. Ask for the Copyright Office Regulations
on Compulsory License for Making and Distributing Phonorecords, Circulars 96
Section 201.18 and 96 Section 201.19, and address your request to:
Library of Congress
Licensing Division, LM-458
101 Independence Avenue, S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20557-6400
Meanwhile, here's another
(PDF) sample of a "pre-fab" Notice of Intention to Obtain a Compulsory
License I found online.
Finally, be aware that being granted a mechanical license does
not mean you can reprint that song's lyrics in your CD's sleeve. (You must clear
these rights through the publisher directly.) And samplesaudio excerpts
from the artist's original master recordingneed to be cleared differently;
for this, you must obtain a MASTER RECORDING LICENSE directly from the
record company that owns the master to the recording. (Here's a PDF
sample for contacting record companies about this; I believe Harry Fox used
to offer this type of license, but has since discontinued doing so.) Further,
sale of MP3 downloads requires a separate DIGITAL
In the end, all the footwork I had to engage in (and anxiety I
had to endure) to legally take this "stocking stuffer" to the next level was
well worth the effort. I now have a CD of songs I really like, performances
I'm proud of, and a nice memento of a personal "place in time" that I can proudly
distribute. I hope you some day consider doing the same. Good luck!
About the Author:
In addition to being a performing/recording musician, Dale Turner
is also West Coast Editor of Guitar One magazine, an instructor at Hollywood's
Musician's Institute, and has authored numerous guitar publications for Hal
Leonard, Cherry Lane, and Warner Brothers. His latest CD, INTERPRETATIONS
- Solo Arrangements for Guitar and Voice, has just been released on
the INTIMATE AUDIO label.
© 2004 Dale Turner ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
[Books Main Page]
[Browse by Artist]
[Used Gear Reference]
Korg GA-20 Tuner
Guitar and Bass guitar tuner. Unless you have the gift of perfect pitch, you should have one of these.